To: | Robert Harper <rharper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Obsessions |
From: | Christian Rasmussen <Christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 16 May 2005 12:04:31 -0400 |
Cc: | "swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
In-reply-to: | <opsqvkorcqtozfut@research_2.rd.iat-cti.com> |
References: | <opsqvkorcqtozfut@research_2.rd.iat-cti.com> |
We'll have to wait for the final test results, but some evidence points
toward hull being cored with a non-cedar. (Not the deck) will create a just as good or better hull. (although lacking some beauty) From Brams earlier email on the subject of testing. -------- "Because of the design of the Swift, the significant hull loads are nearly all in tension and therefore not prone to cyclic degradation--Nomex or Balsa core would not likely make any difference in performance or longevity. " --------------- Good to hear you are enjoying the boat in cold Utah.. Still shivering when thinking of your snow covered mountain picture. Christian Robert Harper wrote: I think that some of us are missing the point that Bram and others have mentioned. That is what is the "cheeper" hull over time. If I could buy/build a hull that will remain competitive for several years that costs event 50% more than a molded hull. How is it better to buy something else that must be replaced every year or two?
smime.p7s |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Obsessions, Robert Harper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Hull construction, some ramblings while I pick the epoxy off my fingers., BDally6107 |
Previous by Thread: | Obsessions, Robert Harper |
Next by Thread: | Re: Hull construction, some ramblings while I pick the epoxy off my fingers., BDally6107 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |