swift-solo
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LIST-swiftsolo-unsubscribe: CNC'd stations

To: Paul Stalker <pgstalker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LIST-swiftsolo-unsubscribe: CNC'd stations
From: Warren Stevens <warren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:16:14 -0800
Cc: swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <001101c3b422$3652f540$6401a8c0@tessa>; from pgstalker@sympatico.ca on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:35:52AM -0500
References: <001101c3b422$3652f540$6401a8c0@tessa>
Reply-to: warren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: Warren Stevens <warren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I too agree with Bram's & Ron's posts.  I don't really see why the
technology used to create station templates should have any affect on
the dimentions of the template.  There may be small variances in
hand-built boats, but the rules allow for those variances (as they
should) and there will likely be other small variances throughout the
construction process.

Warren

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:35:52AM -0500, Paul Stalker wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This just to agree with Bram & Ron's recent points. No personal CNC
> experience, but I think CNC'd stations would be mainly a time-saver. Only
> second more of an easy almost guarantee of fair boat lines. I would think
> any of us spending this much money (& time) is going to do a damn careful
> job and can saw to within 1mm of the final line. Followed up with
> hand-sanding I hope to be within 0.5mm. Perhaps the point of concern is that
> while this may get you successfully Measured, there may still be a
> competitive difference in the final fairness. However, I would think there
> are more than enough other similar construction micro-differences through
> the whole building process to make this a moot point.
> 
> Good work on the rules.
> 
> cheers,
> Paul Stalker
> 

-- 
warren stevens - catzooks.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

This is the Swift Solo mailing list archive. Visit here to see instructions on how to subscribe and unsubscribe from the list, and to browse the mailing list archives.