I thought I had a photo of the sleeve Steve means, but you can only kind
of see it in the attached photo, it's the tube the forestay fitting is
attached to. I guess you could do a search on the web and see how it
looks in profile. In my opinion it is a better idea.
Jordan
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Nichols [mailto:aussieswift@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2006 5:02 PM
To: Swiftsolo
Subject: Class Rules Opinions please
Guys,
I've been talking to Clive at CST re masts for Swifts over here. We are
also going to get the other spars from him ie spinnaker pole and boom.
Clive is very keen to change our pole launching system so the spin pole
retracts into a receiving sleeve a la I14 style. This has a couple of
advantages - smoother launches and no issues with point loads on the
pole. The question I have is that reading the class rules it specifies
that the pole must retract to 700mm of the stem. We would like the
receiving pole to go out to this dimension - this further minimises any
bending that may occur.
What are peoples opinions? Is this breaching the rules or not?
Also what actual length are the poles in use and diameter?
Cheers,
Steve
nb the 14s allow this but it is specifically catered for in their rules
Class rule extract
a. The Spinnaker Pole shall be retractable to within 700mm (27 5/8
inches) of the stem. The length from the AMP to the outer most extremity
of the spar, when the spar is fully extended shall not exceed 6.095m
(240 inches).
Check out my Swift Solo build progress on
www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com
Send instant messages to your online friends
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
forestay attachment.jpg
Description: JPEG image
This is the Swift Solo mailing list. For unsubscribe instructions,
visit here: http://catzooks.com/swift-solo/
|
