swift-solo
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: an ammendment to the class rules

To: <BDally6107@xxxxxxx>,<swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: an ammendment to the class rules
From: "Greg Ryan" <gregoryrryan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:25:43 -0400
References: <6d.47510eb8.2fe10980@aol.com>
mine is longer than that :-)
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: BDally6107@xxxxxxx 
  To: swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 12:33 AM
  Subject: an ammendment to the class rules


  To our class officers and members,

   

  I would like to propose an amendment to our class rules.  The primary 
objective is to limit the length of centerboards with a secondary objective of 
blunting the trailing edge to something less than razor sharp for safety 
reasons.  

   

  Recent developments in other high performance have led to extremely high 
aspect blades that are nearly two feet longer than the longest Swift blade I've 
seen to date.  While it may be OK for boats with crews to deal with this 
extraordinary blade, launching a Swift alone while trying to deal with a blade 
this long would be difficult for seasoned skiff sailors and impossible for 
everyone else. While landing on beaches, these blades will be equally tough to 
deal with alone.  

   

  The problem would normally be self correcting, however, I fear that these 
blades will become necessary in light to medium air if a sailor hopes to be 
competitive. Without an amendment, someone is certain to develop a long board 
and I feel it would be counterproductive to wait till that happens to decide to 
outlaw them.  That process would discourage future blade or rigging development 
because those who spend their time and money working on improvements would not 
be inclined to continue.  Faster, easier, cheaper, and more durable should 
always be our goal.

   

  The trailing edge issue is simply an issue of safety.  A sharp blade will 
likely be imperceptibly faster than a blunted blade.  There is a very real 
danger that a Swift sailor could seriously cut himself during the righting 
process and not get to help in time.  I would suggest that the rule contain the 
following language:  Blades shall be built in such a manner that when a spacer 
gauge with parallel sides 2 mm apart is placed astride of the trailing edge, 
the  gauge shall not be penetrated more than Ââ.           

   

  It is my hope to persuade our executive board to move on this before it 
becomes a problem.  I would appreciate it if your input is posted on the 
mailing list so everyone can hear any arguments to help them make a decision.  
I'm inclined to use 55â as the maximum finished overall length unless boards 
already exist that are a bit longer.

   

  Bram
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

This is the Swift Solo mailing list archive. Visit here to see instructions on how to subscribe and unsubscribe from the list, and to browse the mailing list archives.