In a message dated 3/28/2008 7:10:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rharper@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Not to be a wet blanket, but I think that some of this should have been
brought up earlier if I remember some of the past rules fights we've had.
I think the idea was to have specific proposals a couple months before the
AGM so that participants can take their time to come up with a firm
opinion. Not being a lawer and hating rules and a lot of formality, I'm
not the best to speak on this though.
A couple of things, the question of class growth was discussed and postponed
from last years AGM until this years (if memory serves me correctly). Rules
changes should be discussed and voted on only to bring it to a email ballot
for the entire class. There is an exception for rules changes proposed by
the measurer (again, going from memory). All of this requires an approval of
the class to bring up items not on the agenda--I think.
I'll check on all of this and get back with the actual rules. Headed up to
help Warren finalize his boat. It's exciting to see him ready to get wet.
Best regards,
Bram
As for officers. I'm not sure I've been the best at being president but
would be happy to server another year if the membership wants me to. As
for the rest of the board, I'd say they should at least hold their current
position for another year. I'm not sure changing the treasurer every year
is the best idea. It has been a PITA getting Warren added to the account.
It is much harder than I was originally lead to believe.
We'll have lots of discussions once we get there. The only agenda I have
is to keep thing fun and maybe protect the interests of the home builder
because that is one of my prime reasons for being where I am.
**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL
Home.
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15&ncid=aolhom00030000000001)
|