To: | "swiftsolo.catzooks.com" <swiftsolo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Soldiers, bulkheads and transom... |
From: | "Robert Harper" <rharper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:19:24 -0700 |
In-reply-to: | <1202317063.5490.1235416823@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
References: | <C414697F-2972-4CF9-958A-BF92B7250621@lordofhounds.com> <1202317063.5490.1235416823@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
FWIW, I think you want to still use strips with a cove and bead for the transom and bulkheads. You can go with wider strips if you want but I think the cove and bead will give you a stronger joint because of the increased surface area and shape. Butt joints are not very strong. In fact, they are the weakest joints you can make with wood. I would not try to stray too far from proven methods. Often there are reasons that people go to the extra work for some things. No one wants to do more work than they have to but to take too many shortcuts and have things fail on you is much more wasteful of your time and money. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to solve by using simple butt joints for the transom and bulkheads. If you are trying to save time, I don't think you'll gain much because you'll want to run the strips on a joiner so that the butt joints match up well without voids. I think running the router to put a cove and bead on will be easier and much less expensive than trying to get butt joints to fit properly. When I built my canoe, I used butt joints to join shorter strips together to get the length I needed. This was very problematic for the stripping process so on the later boats, I've used a 12:1 scarf joint that is very strong and works great. I once tried feather joints but I had problems with those because the bond wasn't much stronger than a butt joint and I'd end up with a similar mess to what I had with butt joints. There was a lot more time involved in doing the scarf joints but it sure made a huge difference in the stripping process and the quality of the finished process. I had much less fairing to do and it looked much better. I hate sanding and scraping so if there is something I can do to reduce that part of the process, I'm all over it. On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:57:43 -0700, Warren Stevens <warren@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Crusher (my blog) is mostly what I did with a few addendums from ideas on the list. The idea of cutting strips but not cutting the beads and coves into them for the bulkhead material was something I dreamt up, but haven't tried. It theory it seems like it would be a good way to save some time and effort, but of course, it's not tested... -- Live large, love lots, and sail fast! The mark of who you are is determined by what you do when you don't have to do it. USA 050 Fugu 77959 Wasabi Robert Harper This is the Swift Solo mailing list. For unsubscribe instructions, visit here: http://catzooks.com/swift-solo/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Soldiers, bulkheads and transom..., Warren Stevens |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Soldiers, bulkheads and transom..., Robert Harper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Soldiers, bulkheads and transom..., Warren Stevens |
Next by Thread: | Re: Soldiers, bulkheads and transom..., Robert Harper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |